<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Heaviest and Biggest Military Tanks Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/</link>
	<description>Commercial Vehicles, Construction Vehicles, Emergency Vehicles and Military Vehicles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ritesh Khadka</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritesh Khadka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>well it was long to read but really good and intresting, as i am totally intrested in tanks
              they were just great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it was long to read but really good and intresting, as i am totally intrested in tanks<br />
              they were just great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-6882</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-6882</guid>
		<description>The U.S.Mlitary should build scorpion tanks like in HALO. It would make a great replacement for the M1A1 Abrams in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S.Mlitary should build scorpion tanks like in HALO. It would make a great replacement for the M1A1 Abrams in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuts</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>kuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>Why the not use railroad and what the heavy tank used at battlefield right now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the not use railroad and what the heavy tank used at battlefield right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-6174</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-6174</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, shown to scale is a king tiger and a truck. I don&#039;t think that obtaining the amount of raw materials would be as difficult as the complexity of the design, besides the biggest problem the nazis had was the way they designed tanks, they were meant to look good on paper, that is why they started the war whit tanks that were no better than those of the allies (they believed their tanks were better). It is ironical that hitler brought germany back in power and it is he who drove it into the abys, in this matter he was no better than mussolini, he was presented something on paper and then decided what to make, the problem is he probably never saw a tank in action and he certainly wasn&#039;t a technician. The nazis would probably be much better of if they used their resources to make something that worked, rather than wasting them on such stupid designs, perhaps if the SS would be in charge of their tank construction all along they just might have got the SCHWARZWOLF ready for production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, shown to scale is a king tiger and a truck. I don&#8217;t think that obtaining the amount of raw materials would be as difficult as the complexity of the design, besides the biggest problem the nazis had was the way they designed tanks, they were meant to look good on paper, that is why they started the war whit tanks that were no better than those of the allies (they believed their tanks were better). It is ironical that hitler brought germany back in power and it is he who drove it into the abys, in this matter he was no better than mussolini, he was presented something on paper and then decided what to make, the problem is he probably never saw a tank in action and he certainly wasn&#8217;t a technician. The nazis would probably be much better of if they used their resources to make something that worked, rather than wasting them on such stupid designs, perhaps if the SS would be in charge of their tank construction all along they just might have got the SCHWARZWOLF ready for production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-5063</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-5063</guid>
		<description>Today, doctrine drives the characteristics of tank development.  After WWI, Germany was best positioned to develop an armored force doctrine which emphasized speed, penetration and exploitation - perfect role for the tank.  As they explored what characteristic the ideal tank should have they learned that bigger was better until they went through the ceiling and over did it.  Well-armored and armed mediums became the most successful in a broad application of tasks but they had to explore the limits.  The big tanks failed and went away because they were too specialized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, doctrine drives the characteristics of tank development.  After WWI, Germany was best positioned to develop an armored force doctrine which emphasized speed, penetration and exploitation &#8211; perfect role for the tank.  As they explored what characteristic the ideal tank should have they learned that bigger was better until they went through the ceiling and over did it.  Well-armored and armed mediums became the most successful in a broad application of tasks but they had to explore the limits.  The big tanks failed and went away because they were too specialized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean simon</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-4394</link>
		<dc:creator>sean simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-4394</guid>
		<description>i wish to buy tanks
 any make or aircraft and they dont have to be able to drive fly
sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish to buy tanks<br />
 any make or aircraft and they dont have to be able to drive fly<br />
sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ory</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator>ory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-3803</guid>
		<description>which railroad could stand 1500 tons .
the heaviest locomotive in history was 450 tons . that tank would smash the railroads in seconds .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which railroad could stand 1500 tons .<br />
the heaviest locomotive in history was 450 tons . that tank would smash the railroads in seconds .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-3521</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a concept picture of the p.1500 &quot;Monster&quot; from wikipedia.  Seems to fit with other concept art I&#039;ve seen of it, but this is one opf the best reditions, shown to scale with with I think is a &quot;Maus&quot;, and a truck.

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:P1500_Monster.gif&amp;filetimestamp=20090318103623</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a concept picture of the p.1500 &#8220;Monster&#8221; from wikipedia.  Seems to fit with other concept art I&#8217;ve seen of it, but this is one opf the best reditions, shown to scale with with I think is a &#8220;Maus&#8221;, and a truck.</p>
<p><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:P1500_Monster.gif&amp;filetimestamp=20090318103623" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:P1500_Monster.gif&amp;filetimestamp=20090318103623</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>The reasons that they were not persued in Europe were that 1) the infrastructure couldn&#039;t support them. Areas were too built up, roads were narrow, even the autobahn had limits on bridges both in weight and width. 2) as fuel became harder to obtain,  it became logistically impossible to sustain.  And 3) as was shown in the Ostfront, when the spring came, everything turned to mud. these monsters would just sink in and become a permanent fixture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasons that they were not persued in Europe were that 1) the infrastructure couldn&#8217;t support them. Areas were too built up, roads were narrow, even the autobahn had limits on bridges both in weight and width. 2) as fuel became harder to obtain,  it became logistically impossible to sustain.  And 3) as was shown in the Ostfront, when the spring came, everything turned to mud. these monsters would just sink in and become a permanent fixture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web</title>
		<link>http://www.provehicles.co.uk/top-10-heaviest-and-biggest-military-tanks-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.provehicles.co.uk/?p=68#comment-78</guid>
		<description>that was very informative i thought, tanks rock :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was very informative i thought, tanks rock <img src='http://www.provehicles.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
